![]() |
|
||||||||
Local technology applications and plans should include a description of the steps the applicant will take to ensure that all students and teachers have increased access to technology. The description must include how the applicant will use Ed Tech funds to help students in high-poverty and high-needs schools, or schools identified for improvement or corrective action under section 1116 of Title I, and to help ensure that teachers are prepared to integrate technology effectively into curricula and instruction. OverviewThe issue of increased accessibility to technology has taken on new meaning for teachers and students, even as connectivity has improved and the number of computers in schools has steadily increased. Accessibility extends beyond hardware and connections to encompass a complex combination of factors that includes training, content, attitudes, learner differences, and supportive environments for both teachers and students.
|
|||||||||
|
Strategies for Addressing Local Technology Applications and PlansInfrastructure for TechnologyOver the past five years, the CEO Forum Report has chronicled the remarkable progress districts and schools have made in acquiring hardware, establishing connectivity, ensuring teachers receive technology training and integrating digital content into the curriculum. In addition to analyzing these issues, the CEO Forum has developed several useful tools that can be applied during planning for technology. One of these tools, the STaR Chart, provides a useful rubric that a No Child Left Behind (NCLB) applicant may apply when analyzing their district's effectiveness of integrating technology into the teaching and learning process. For example, the Texas Education Agency Educational Technology Advisory Committee (ETAC) developed its own version of the STaR Chart for the purpose of planning, budgeting and evaluating technology readiness at the district level. The foundation of these charts is a set of indicators that describe four distinct school types: Early Tech, Developing Tech, Advanced Tech and Target Tech. The Texas STaR Chart provides the following infrastructure indicators for Target Tech schools:
Although the STaR Charts do not provide a definitive measure for determining a specific level of access, they do provide the NCLB applicant with several clearly defined benchmarks that will help them identify the necessary planning steps needed to ensure that all students and teachers have increased access to technology. Meeting the needs of all learnersBeyond connectivity and equipment, an effective technology plan addresses the equitable access barriers of gender, poverty, race, ethnicity, and special needs. These barriers, whether subtle or overt, may impact "the students' ability to use it [technology] toward meaningful goals" (U.S. Department of Education, 2000) and are especially evident in schools that are low performing or that have high needs and few resources. One general strategy to address learner differences includes the application of universal design principles in order to improve usability for all students. Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is a new paradigm for teaching, learning and assessment, drawing on new brain research and new media technologies to respond to individual learner differences (CAST, 2000). UDL strategies include a range of assistive technologies that have emerged to address a variety of special needs, including learning disorders, vision and hearing impairments, and limited fine motor skills. The rapid development of new solutions has resulted in improved assistive technologies at affordable costs that make access possible for every student. Solutions include screen readers, sound amplifiers, and hardware modifications, among others. More approaches to specific barriers may include equal access and relevant content for males and females, culturally relevant resources, and adaptive technologies. Supporting Curriculum, Assessment and InstructionAs applicants consider the issue of accessibility, an essential step includes evaluating how technology tools and applications are aligned to the curriculum, assessment, and instruction development process. This alignment will strengthen the expectation that all students will use technology in the learning process, and highlight the importance of preparing teachers to deliver honed curriculum units that leverage technology solutions.
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| Technology Briefs for No
Child Left Behind Planners was developed by the Northeast and the Islands
Regional Technology Consortium (NEIRTEC) project, a collaboration of Education
Development Center, Inc. (EDC), TERC, Education Alliance at Brown University
and Learning Innovations at WestEd, funded by the U.S. Department of Education.
© 2002 Education Development Center, Inc. All rights reserved. Permission to copy is granted for educational use. |
|||||||||
| NEIRTEC Partners:
|
Extended Resources Benton Foundation The CEO Forum The Texas STaR Chart The Center for Applied Special Technology Adaptive Technology for the Internet: Making Electronic Resources Accessible
to All
|
||||||||
ReferencesCenter for Applied Special Technology. Summary of Universal Design for Learning Concepts. Retrieved June 12, 2002. Available online at http://www.cast.org/udl/index.cfm?i=7. U.S. Department of Education (2000). The Secretary's Conference on Educational Technology: Measuring Impacts and Shaping the Future. Retrieved June 12, 2002. Available online at http://www.ed.gov/Technology/techconf/2000/report.html#question4. Russell, M., D. Bebell, et al. (2002). An AlphaSmart for each student:
Does teaching and learning change with full access to word processors?
Retrieved May, 2002. Available online at http://www.bc.edu/research/intasc/studies/AlphaSmartEachStudent/description.shtml.
|